I watched Juno last night. I should have heeded my instinct that Harlow’s Monkey nailed it in her review but I had to go and experience the movie myself, and have my own opinion.
To cope with how fucking annoyed I was from the minute the movie started until it ended, I “live blogged” on my cell phone as I watched it, creating an email for a friend who saw it already and I knew she would agree with much of my take and perhaps laugh a little at my night shift, PMS induced attempts at witticisms.
After that I re-read Jae Ran’s (of Harlow’s Monkey) review and saw that I had many of the same reactions, and I swear I had forgotten every word of her review except that she used the words hetero and normative, which I had mushed into one word in my brain and thought she said hetero-normative. (The actual quote: “Unlike Juno, which for all its surface layer of being rebellious and unconventional, was in reality the most strident heterosexual, white, nuclear normative-family promoting movie I’ve seen in a long time.”)
OK now I must warn you. I am shamelessly spoiling in this review. If you have not seen the movie, and wish to form your own opinion, don’t read one. line. further. On the other hand, if you loved the movie, hey, don’t let my hating take that away from you. I know a LOT of people were somehow moved and/or inspired by it. I, on the other hand, was enraged and sickened and you do not need me goth-puking all over your DVD.
I have definitely done too much adoption protest and reform reading to enjoy any movie that takes a conventional view of adoption. Some might accuse me of having lost all sense of humor and perspective on this topic. They would be correct in that assessment.
I also use the word “retard” in an insulting way, but I am criticizing a certain stereotypically stupid male, not a real person, so that’s OK right? Probably not but consider yourself warned about the unPC use of language that cannot possibly be more over the top than the China joke about babies and ipods that I refuse to quote but I know you can google just by plugging in Juno+China+adopt+ipod. In fact, I expect to see that search string on my wordpress dashboard very soon.
And I make a sweeping positive generalization about women with piercings and negative one about middle-aged nurses. The former must be true because I have never met a woman with piercings in an abortion clinic who was not nice. The latter is not true because I am a middle-aged nurse but I figure I can make the negative generalization about “my” people.
If anything I have said so far has begun to give you heart burn, bail now. You are so totally and thoroughly warned.
My Juno Live Blog
Watching it. Can it get anymore annoying? I think I hate it for the same reasons kids love it. I am sticking it out and considering it research.
Oh god shoot me now. This movie is annoying the living shit out of me. Not even sure why. I like quirky dialogue. I have watched every episode of seven seasons of Buffy the Vampire Slayer at least three times and loved all the unrealistic and original dialogue in it, even things they said that were much too mature for the characters because I knew the middle-aged writers couldn’t resist. But this is just so unconvincing and unsympathetic.
She just met the wannabe parents and it was probably the most realistic (albeit entirely unethical and insensitive) scene so far but I want the Wannabes to fall down and die dead. Now I sound like Juno would if she would actually use her BS detector on these dorks.
Ok, points for the confrontation with the ultrasound tech. That was cool, how they told the tech that adoption might be worse for the baby than keeping it.
I have met this Mrs Wannabe too many times.
Does anyone in this movie like anyone?
References to Stillwater (where the antiques are, no less) and St Cloud indicate that it takes place in Minnesota-which explains why no one seems to like each other. Minnesota Ice without the accent. They could have at least have learned our accent to go with that freaky dialogue.
The China comment is gratuitously, obnoxiously, patently racist. I could almost forgive a 16 year old for coming up with it (out of ignorance or a desire for attention) but an adult writer put these words in an actress’s mouth. That I have a hard time forgiving.
The uptight Mrs Wannabe talking to Juno’s bare stomach in the mall? Out of character much?
Ew and very unlikely about her cute cheerleader friend crushing on the fat middle-aged hairy faced teacher. (I can hear PJ shifting in his swivel chair. It’s OK hunny, I love you but I don’t think cheerleaders would find you appealing and that makes me feel more secure than ever with you.)
Hey Mr Director, does Juno’s boyfriend have to act SO retarded? You are a guy. You really should give your gender more credit.
The sexual chemistry between Juno and Mr Wannabe(NOT) is totally unnecessary. Is it simply a vehicle to fuck things up? They could have done that any. other. way.
Ok I’ll bite. Adoptions can disrupt on the Wannabe side. And should well, if divorce is immanent. But “Your shirt is stupid” ? What kind of mature adult would say that to another (not-so-mature) adult?
Finally Juno cries, not because she is giving the baby up but because she almost gave it to a broken home.
Keep the baby! Keep the baby!
Well, it’s not just the boyfriend who is special needs. Her dad is too. As is Mr Wannabe(NOT). I get it. Men are just stupid.
Let’s watch a stereotypical birthing scene where the girl is mad at everyone but keeps her lipstick on. Wait, Juno wears lipstick?
Keep the damned baby dammit!
OMG, no fucking way.
“How do I look?” These are the words of the ideal adoptive mother? She picks up “her” new baby (hers all along!), looks at the baby’s not-to-be grandmother (who looks a little angry? sad? befuddled? bemused?) and says “How do I look?” And the grandmother says something more supportive to Mrs Wannabe than she ever said to her own (step)daughter like, “Like a new mother. Scared…”
Oh sweet jesus. Take me now.
Oh and yeah, her boyfriend is totally boss because relinquishing a baby without even LOOKING at it is such an aphrodisiac. And they get their childhoods back, learn to play guitar duets and live irresponsibly ever after. No worse for the wear, just as Juno predicted at the beginning when the baby was still a thing.
(Actually when Juno was seeing the baby as a thing, it was semi-realistic in that a baby tends not to feel real in an undesired pregancy until close to or after birth. But Juno is not a looker backer, oh no. The thing is out and she is getting on with life and loving, all over again, the boy who put the thing in her. But it wasn’t his idea, remember? He’s too stupid to get an idea like that.
THIS IS TOTALLY AN AD FOR ADOPTION OPTING! It’s freaking propaganda!
Two thumbs and two toes down, as JL would say.
And now, a few follow-up reflections on the wholly unreflective nature of this movie:
There was no reflecting on why Juno failed to get an abortion at a time when she considered her fetus a thing. There was something about fingernails in a dialogue with a terribly lame character who was unfortunately Asian and was probably made to act like she couldn’t act. (And omg, no one acts that slovenly and unprofessional when they are checking you in at an abortion clinic, even if they do have multiple piercings.) (I have worked at the shittiest abortion clinic in town so I KNOW that the women with the piercings are the NICEST ones. It’s the middle-aged nurses who have been in the business too long that you need to watch out for.)
Furthermore, there was no reflecting on why Juno could not have a baby and raise it in her parents’ home with their support. OK her parents had–for exactly one minute–wished upon Juno hard drugs over pregnancy but then they went along with it very matter of factly and Step Mom even made her take good care of herself.
No one asked the grandparents and the grandparents never offered to help raise the baby. How can this be? It happens. A lot. One could make a case that Juno was an island unto herself within this family and had no maternal urges; did in fact see the baby as a thing up until relinquishment and forever after. But if that is so, she had serious problems that were not reflected in her (severely lacking) character development. One could also make a case that Juno simply did not want to have a baby. (Which brings us back to why she decided not to abort. Fingernails?)
But Juno never made a case for much of anything, nor was any kind of case inferred.
The treatment of men in this movie was incredibly disrespectful of birth fathers and grandfathers. These were not mean or cavalier men, but they had the absolute dumbest lines and facial expressions. That Juno was the brightest bulb in the midst of very low wattage (see what quirky dialogue does for my blogging?) was not saying much. Even Minnesotans are more complicated than these people were portrayed. Really. I know a lot of smart men here in Minnesota who even have some feelings.
Since it is SO popular, I wanted this to be a movie that raised the issue of choice and responsibility in sexual behavior and resulting pregnancies among adolescents but it seemed much more to be a commercial for young white pregnant teens to find rich white couples, who regardless of emotional stability and taste in romantic partners, are surely better parents than a 16 year old. Even if they say shit like “Your shirt is stupid.” and “How do I look?”
And finally, the fantasy that a pregnancy can be carried to term and a baby relinquished, and a young mother’s childhood restored as if the interruption never happened–or at least made you a better person–is just that. A fantasy that few relinquishing birth mothers (that I know of) can attest to.
I wanted for Juno (and viewers her age) to at least learn that what Step Mom said at the beginning was true, that giving up a baby is a hard thing to do. But this is not the movie where that happens. If anyone said anything true about the movie to me before I saw it, it was a 21 year old going on 14, with whom I worked in retail, who said, “It’s about a teen pregnancy, but not really.”